• http://twitter.com/brocromanek Broc Romanek

    Here’s what I blogged last year about this effort by the SEC: I think the SEC should be taking steps that will have a much greater impact on voter participation. Starting with improving the usability of proxy cards, voting instructions – and the communications that go along with them. Most communications are laden with legalese and use 200 words when 20 will suffice – a critical mistake when using e-mail to get someone to act. Check out my DealLawyers.com blog entry today for more on my beef here. And I know many corporates are unhappy that they still aren’t permitted to send a proxy card or voting phone number in their e-proxy notice mailings…

    This excerpt is pulled from: http://www.thecorporatecounsel.net/Blog/2010/02/all-the-rage-tender-offers.html

  • http://twitter.com/dougchia Douglas K. Chia
    • http://irwebreport.com Dominic Jones

      I see the link to the SEC’s content on the second link you’ve provided (really had to look for it) but not the other two.

      The second link doesn’t doesn’t show up in Yahoo! Site Explorer because it’s using javascript for a popup rather than a straight-through link.

      So, yes, J&J is linking.

      • http://twitter.com/dougchia Douglas K. Chia

        The 1st and 3rd links give retail shareholders of JNJ (both record holders and street side holders) direct access to sign up to receive and view proxy materials electronically. Thought it was worth mentioning as a retail shareholder directed effort by J&J.

      • http://twitter.com/dougchia Douglas K. Chia

        Also added something to the “Corporate Governance FAQs” page since you mentioned it was hard for people to find the info: http://www.investor.jnj.com/governance/faq.cfm

  • Pingback: This week in Investor Relations | IR Web Report