• About
    • Site Profile
    • Pam Agnew, ABC (editor)
    • Dominic Jones (editor)
    • Richard Ketchen (contributor)
    • Ezra Marbach (contributor)
    • Vanessa Schoenthaler (contributor)
  • Contacts
  • Advertise
  • Premium Services
IR Web Report
  • Latest Posts
  • Categories
    • Web Disclosure
    • Annual Reports
    • Quarterly Reporting
    • Presentations
    • Social Media
    • IR Law
    • Governance
    • Shareholder Services
    • Video
    • Mobile
  • Book Store
  • Jobs
  • Vendor Directory
Browse: Home / At annual meeting, Starbucks distracted by shiny objects

At annual meeting, Starbucks distracted by shiny objects

By Dominic Jones on March 24, 2011

  • Tweet

COFFEE company Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) held its annual meeting in front of a 2000-strong crowd in its hometown Seattle yesterday – and if you weren’t able to be there in person you could tune in to a video webcast and live tweeting session to stay in the loop.

I wasn’t able to do either, but figured I’d catch up last night by using the webcast replay or perhaps a recap in a news release or SEC filing. It turned out, however, that I started on Twitter, where Starbucks has a huge following of almost 1.4 million.

Since its main Twitter feed is mostly for customers and typically extremely busy, Starbucks has set up a separate Twitter account for events. The Starbuckslive account is a clever idea that other consumer companies should consider, if they don’t have a separate investor relations account (Starbucks doesn’t).

starbucks_agm1

In 3 dozen or so tweets, I got the gist of the day’s event, including photos shot from a phone of a few executives and singer Martha Wainwright doing a rendition of Bob Marley’s No Woman, No Cry. But what I really wanted were the results of the vote, and the tweets didn’t mention them.

From one tweet, I followed a link to the annual meeting webcast on Starbucks’ investor relations website. After filling in a registration form that asked how many people were tuning in from my location (just me), I got this:

starbucks_agm3

Now, it was almost 12 hours after the event and Thomson Reuters hadn’t been able to post a replay yet. I don’t know why Starbucks used Thomson Reuters when it has an account on Ustream that probably would’ve been faster (and cheaper), but that’s besides the point. I still didn’t have the results.

Next I looked for an SEC filing but nothing had been filed yet.

A few clicks later, I spotted a link to a news release about the annual meeting. Gosh, I don’t know who writes Starbucks’ news releases, but they need to cut back on the caffeine. We’re talking prose more purple than Martha Wainwright’s tights. Here’s a sample:

The company reviewed a year of strong financial results and outlined the blueprint for continued success. Starbucks exited fiscal 2010 and entered fiscal 2011 with record-setting financial results driven by the return of top line growth and continued operational efficiencies that resulted in dramatic margin and earnings acceleration throughout the year. This record-setting performance and the underlying health of the business establish a strong foundation from which to pursue multiple avenues of future profitable growth.

The entire thing is like that. But no word about the voting results.

Frustrated, I turned to Google News to see if there were any media reports about the meeting. There were a bunch, but none except one mentioned voting results.

In a story headlined Not a Peet’s peep from Starbucks at annual meeting, Seattle Times business reporter Melissa Allison gave me what felt like the only decaf version of the meeting, including this:

It was a calm gathering for the 2,000 or so people who did not completely fill McCaw Hall at Seattle Center, and most of whom left before the three-hour meeting ended.

And then this:

A shareholder proposal that would have required Starbucks to adopt a comprehensive recycling strategy received just 8.1 percent of the shares voted, based on a preliminary count. A similar proposal last year won 11 percent.

But that’s just one of the proposals before the meeting. I was interested in the two say-on-pay resolutions and two resolutions about the company’s 2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

To be clear, there’s no requirement for Starbucks or any other company to release results, even preliminary ones, publicly immediately following the meeting. However, if you’re a shareholder who has taken the time to vote but can’t attend the meeting or the webcast, you want to know.

And because Starbucks didn’t tell me, all of their communications began to seem like a lot of hot air.

I’m all for using the web to get more people interested in your companies (that’s what this site is all about), but let’s not forget what these meetings are really about.


Dominic Jones

Dominic (bio & disclosures) is IR Web Report‘s founder and an online investor relations consultant. He advises leading public companies and investor relations service providers worldwide on using the web for disclosure, engagement and profile building. You can contact him via the contacts page.

Posted in Corporate Governance | Tagged annual meetings, proxy voting, voting results | 1 Response

  • Pingback: 140Char » 140Char Links 03/25/2011

« Previous Next »

Search the Site

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us

Get Our Free Email Newsletter

Close
Note: We don't sell or rent our email list. Unsubscribe instructions come with each email.

Latest Stories

  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
Investor relations jobs by IR Web Report
Visit the IR services directory

  • Morningstar Investor Relations Services
  • Pristine Advisers
  • b2i Technologies, Inc.
  • InsuranceIR LLC

Full Disclosure

All articles on IR Web Report are unpaid editorial. We do not charge a fee to outside contributors. Sponsors or advertisers are not automatically entitled to become contributors or receive editorial coverage. We accept contributors based on their individual expertise and experience. Contributors are required to disclose when they write about or refer to any company with which they have a business relationship, either directly or indirectly. If you believe that any contributor or IR Web Report is not living up this policy, please contact us or leave a comment on the relevant post. Editorial integrity is important to us and we take all complaints seriously.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Terms of Use
  • Be visible on IR Web Report
  • Investis Online IR Rankings
  • About the Rankings
  • IR Web Report’s Book Store
  • IR News
  • About
  • Contacts

Archives

  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us


Follow @irwebreport
Feed Subscribe to feed

Copyright © 2001 - 2012 IR Web Reporting International Inc. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.