• http://irwebreport.com Dominic Jones

    I’m a little ambivalent to the IDT approach. It gives management too much control. They get to choose the questions and have time to craft answers in writing.

    For someone like me who does not know IDT at all, this can give the impression that they have something to hide and are uncomfortable taking questions they might not be ready to answer.

    Of course, much depends on how useful their written replies are and which questions they are prepared to answer. The tougher the questions the better. But right off the bat they’ll have to work harder to establish credibility with me online.

    But the other examples are great ideas.

  • http://twitter.com/pkiss Patrick Kiss

    I like Microvision’s approach and can imagine, that we’ll do it the same way, when our IR blog starts in a few weeks.

    Decreasing the amount of time required to respond to follow-up phone calls from analysts, shareholders, journalists etc. is for us definitely one of the main reasons to set up a blog. We see a blog as a temporary FAQ section, too, but with an archive character of course.

    Transcripts are – at least to my knowledge – very rarely used in Germany unfortunately. Many CEOs and CFOs are maybe afraid of the limited room for interpretation, if things are written. If only the audio reply is available, they may see a backdoor to say “No, that’s not what I meant, you got me wrong”.

    Transcription services are hard to find here, therefore I already searched for a software to do this job. All I found was Dragon Dictation (iPhone App). It works very good for short comments, but I haven’t tried it for a 45 minutes call yet.

  • Pingback: 5 ways IR departments are improving their earnings calls | IR Web Report