• http://www.qbillion.com Peter Skalla

    Blame to go around certainly . . . but I’m inclined to agree that Bloomberg is not to blame. They’re doing their job of making information public. Better it goes out on Bloomberg than a few hedge funds obtain and act on the information surreptitiously.

    • http://irwebreport.com Dominic Jones

      “Better it goes out on Bloomberg than a few hedge funds obtain and act on the information surreptitiously.”

      Have to agree. Makes you wonder, though, how long some hedge funds, or others, have been doing this without anyone knowing. It’s not that hard to figure out which companies are good targets.

  • Gary Tiedemann

    The benefit of Bloomberg’s “reporting” here is too expose this practice to wider scrutiny and awareness. It is an almost certainty that if Bloomberg figured this out many hedge funds have been doing this sort of thing for who knows how long. Companies need to understand the risk of losing control of their material information even a few second early and the NYSE needs to be on the vanguard of this issue by helping their member companies get smart really quick.

    • http://irwebreport.com Dominic Jones

      As far as I know, Bloomberg has not officially confirmed that it has a spider. I know that through reliable sources, but they’ve not publicly confirmed its existence. They’ve just confirmed that they are the source of the early news without explaining how they obtained the information.