• http://stefanpettersson.posterous.com/ Stefan Pettersson

    Great post Thomas. I also like the idea of a platform independent approach. But if a company really wants to develop an iPad application for IR, why not an app that provides a more integrated view, e.g. keeping the user up-to-date on the latest developments relevant to an investor/analyst while also providing access to financial data, annual reports, etc? But I guess you can just as well access all this on the IR website…

  • http://irwebreport.com Dominic Jones

    The “web app” approach, which means the content can live on any device, seems to make a lot of sense. YouTube’s web app is a good example of this: http://m.youtube.com/

    I have mixed feelings about the IR “app” buzz. On the one hand, it’s good that the iPad is focusing IR teams once again on using technology to present their content. On the other hand, there’ll be a great squandering of money and effort, and a ton of apps that will never be used, which isn’t good for the web communications industry.

    Hopefully, firms that sell Apple-specific apps to IR departments will work through the pros and cons with their clients, present all of the options and set reasonable expectations. Most iPhone and iPad apps will fail, and that needs to be made clear to companies.

    Of course, a few will be very successful, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

  • Karin Tyche

    Thomas, I agree that a company creating an app for the iPad isn’t really interesting until more people actually have iPads. Though isn’t it a bit restricted to talk about this as something each company would do for themselves, seperated from all other companies? Isn’t interaction the keyword here, interaction in the sense that one could develop an app that aggregated a bunch of annual reports, allowing users to chose which specific parts they wanted to see, and thereby easily compare numbers etc to other companies? I imagine a specialist analyst-app that would allow analysts to lift numbers in and out to stresstest a company in different scenarios. Or an investor-app where individual investors could compare all companies in a peer group with regards to sustainability, salaries, and other aspects. Companies could monitor this interaction and get valuable information feeded back.

    I guess all this is possible on the webb as well but isn’t iPads about improved user-experience rather that unique content (which is problematic from an IR-perspective anyway)?

  • http://solutions.wolterskluwer.com/blog/ Veena Fox Parekh

    Thanks for the insightful post Thomas. Indeed the proprietary format model poses real problems for consumers and content producers alike. I’ve thought a lot about this in the e-reader market. As a consumer, I absolutely refuse to buy an e-reader that only allows material in proprietary formats or makes it hard to use open formats like ePub.

    I fully agree that a platform-independent approach is the way we should be thinking – but I also need to balance that with internal demands this year for an app that would work on iPad. Positioning is key, but also critical is that it should offer value for users as an alternative way to consume our report.

  • Pingback: Annual reports for iPhones & iPads: hype or good idea? « Nexxar's Team Blog

  • http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com Tristán White

    Really enjoyed reading your piece.

    I’m not sure you need to be too worried over the iPad lacking “support for key software like Excel spreadsheets.” The ‘Documents to Go’ app costs just $10 and with that you can read and edit Excel files (and Word, etc). I am sure that most IR people, analysts, etc, who are iPad evangelists will have already installed that app, especially as they will be familiar with it already from the various iPhones, Palms etc that they have had in the past.

    I am interested as you know, so I have just now this moment set up a very short survey to see whether people would find it useful to be able to access annual reports in this way on their iPads. I will share the results with you once I have a meaningful amount of data: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MLD96CC
    Feel free to send that URL on to anyone else!

  • http://www.nexxar.com Thomas

    Many thanks to all of you sharing your thoughts and thanks to IR Web Report for opening up this plattform for contributors to connect with this great audience!!

    @Karin if we do an app for our clients we will open up this app for all corporates to use as plattform. This could be a possible good thing, one favorite reporting app instead of a bunch of different branded company reporting apps.

    @Tristán please share your results with us, would be very interesting!

    I take from here that the platform independent approach seems to be worth exploring more!

  • Mitch Popilchak

    Thomas,

    Excellent posting and conversation.

    I agree that the independent platform that the ipad represents is not a global solution. Building truly platform agnostic Online Annual Reports is the best investment an IR team can make. The ipad does have a browser, as will the blackberry. All mobile devices do regardless of size. But not everyone has an ipad.

    Converting the printed Annual to an epub (or other – Kindle, etc) format would appear to be a more cost effective solution and reach more platforms. The ability for the Analyst/Investor to download an Annual into their ibooks and have it on their device at all times, regardless of connectivity would be a great step forward.

    If we ever see XBRL globally, will this not provide the method to compare companies? Perhaps those XBRL readers will be available as Apps and then you can compare using the ipad?

    Cheers!

  • http://irwebreport.com Dominic Jones, IR Web Report

    @Karin @Mitch I suspect analysts will use Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, EdgarOnline, FactSet, Morningstar etc. on their iPads to do comparative analysis and these apps will win out over any new service or individual company app. The data these services are using is increasingly XBRL.

    The “offline” scenario intrigues me. First, how often are iPad users offline, even on a plane? Second, PDF works offline, and is natively supported by iOS (and many other operating systems).

    The more I think about it, the browser on these devices works very well and there’s no reason a good, standards based online annual report, with alternatives for Flash content, shouldn’t meet the needs of iPad or iPhone users. And I bet it will be easier to find an online annual report in the browser than in the App Store. YouTube’s HTML5 web app works great, and it looks and feels just like something from the App Store.

  • http://www.nexxar.com Thomas

    I very much like all the insightful inputs. Of course (and not just because of the nature of my business) I agree, that a good online Annual Report should be the main point of entry for any online connected device! There is just so much more you can do in terms of interactivity if you are online.

    Just because I am currently discussing with a client:
    Do you think a slim mobile HTML Annual Report (just the focal points with deep links into the full online report) makes sense?

    • http://irwebreport.com Dominic Jones, IR Web Report

      I’m trying to think of scenarios where accessing annual report information on a phone might occur. Here’s one that immediately sprang to mind:

      A retail shareholder receives an email from a company telling him or her that the company’s annual report has been published online. They are given the option to view the full version or a mobile version. Since they’re on their mobile when they receive the email, they choose the mobile version. The content of the mobile version probably should be all about connecting with and engaging the user rather than delivering detailed information. It also may be designed to get them to vote at the annual meeting, in which case there should be links to a mobile voting site. Another objective might be to encourage the user to save the company’s web app to the mobile desktop for future use.

      I can’t think of other scenarios at the moment.

  • Thomas Rosenmayr

    Hm, I got a funny follow-up message on Facebook that made me think a bit.
    Is this a revolutionary concept for presenting Annual Report content?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhcPX1wVp38

  • Thomas Rosenmayr

    Further to the above conversation I would like to point to a comprehensive Usability Study of iPad Apps and Websites done by Nielsen Norman Group.

    It lays out some of the design conundrums of current iPad apps.

    http://www.nngroup.com/reports/mobile/ipad/

  • http://www.systemone.net Michael Schuster

    Very interesting viewpoints that you brought up Thomas, although I have to disagree in some aspects:

    1. The iPhone and the iPad are different media types, hence they should be treated as such

    I think that the nature of a tablet combined with the specific options that both the iPhone and the iPad offer, we should aim at leveraging those options accordingly. I agree with you that both devices are very different and should be treated differently according to their use cases.

    The iPhone I guess is more of an ad hoc research / search device, I imagine a person sitting in a meeting, on the plane or reading something while travelling, so only having a basic version with links to the online report don’t make sense. Either the app is fully offline capable and searchable to have a real usage scenario, or you would probably just use Google on the iPhone and sift through the online report. But I think, that if you have a publishing workflow that allows for easy repackaging of the content, having a full version, with a searchable content and a graphic section would be a great service, combined with multimedia this would be really great.

    With the iPad I think that its even more necessary to repackage the app to fit the screen and the possibilities, think of all the options that you might have, which are more than just using multitouch to resize an image.

    As you said: the options are similar to those reports on paper, and you wouldn’t just take the HTML version of the report and print it. You will very likely try to use the full potential of the medium.

    2. Prefering a device specific approach over a platform approach

    I think that the difference here is that you focus on the publishing process and my viewpoint would focus more on the use cases. So I guess being inline with the argument above, I would favor those approaches where the content is fitted to the device (medium) but is cross-media published out of one infrastructure.

    The current HTML5 approaches that some frameworks offer, trying to mimic a native iPhone / iPad app are never going to offer the same feeling as a real native app, because those apps are integrated deeper into the device.

    I’m comparing this to other publishing workflows, where of course the content that is the basis for the product is generated out of a platform that supports more than just device, but in turn the device is not limited by the platform in the background.

    Take for example the Interactive Ad from Codewort that I just found by chance:

    http://codewort.com/

    Of course such an app could probably have been made using HTML5, but it feels smoother, it works better, it looks better being done in Objective C.

    So far for my argument, would be interested to hear your thoughts on this.

  • http://www.ry.com Jim Crawford

    Thomas,

    Great you are encouraging the iPhone/iPad debate.

    The tablet opportunity starts with the audience first – the demographics of tablet early adopters, user profiles (specific to the IR community) and the scenarios when they naturally use their tablets and for what purpose.

    With this in mind, tablet user behaviour will be key in shaping the presentation of IR information (annual report or otherwise), in the same way that best practice presentation of online reports has been honed over time for traditional digital platforms.

    In the reporting context, the iPad has presented initial considerations already, including: gestural navigation (including: navigation is controlled using a finger, which is considerably bigger than a mouse); rotational smart rendering (even if ignored); opportunities for personal interaction (e.g. personal note mentioned above) and sharing content.

    The luxury of a iPad reporting app brings some interesting (and exciting) challenges, but will not be a replacement for exisiting reporting channels (from many levels). Platform-independent reporting is probably the way forward.