• http://www.q4websystems.com Darrell Heaps

    Some very interesting research. Although I don’t completely support that clicks=engagement, I do agree it’s an indicator of interest.

    Garmin and Ebay for instance tweet a great deal of information during earnings so users wouldn’t necessarily have to click to get the details. Also, for Garmin there is no way to track clicks to their IR website, which may be higher.

    In terms of idea that ‘companies that engage generate higher clicks’. It seems Potash is the flip side of Lafarge. Potash only follows 1 person and uses Twitter as a one-way channel, but yet due to the market interest generates higher clicks this quarter. Perhaps clicks is more an indicator of market interest of the news, rather than anything to do with Twitter?

    I’m a huge fan of BASF, they do so many things right. In social media and on their IR website. Clearly a best practice leader.

    Twitter for IR is certainly changing a lot. Keep up the great research. I look forward to the Q4 results.

  • Dominic Jones

    Darrell:

    Agree click-thrus are just an indicator and no one knows if any tweets are actually read. However, in the absence of other indicators, it’s the best we have.

    It’s clear, though, that you need to work at Twitter if you want to be successful. It’s like any relationship in that way. I think PotashCorp’s results are an aberration that we won’t see repeated next quarter.

    I don’t plan to update this next quarter. Might do something else, though.

  • Pingback: 5 things that make BASF’s online IR great | IR Web Report