IT’S NOW mid-2010. And still, investor relations (IR) professionals are largely avoiding use of social media. Yet, the topic of social media has not only dominated IR discussion for what seems like an eternity but it’s also widely considered — especially among IR pros — an essential online tool for investor communications. Is there a good explanation for this — so much talk and so much praise, but so little action?
To be fair, many IR pros are using investor websites like StockTwits and SeekingAlpha (both of which I’ve written about here and here, respectively) to monitor what’s being said about their companies online. Both sites are useful for monitoring purposes as they enjoy large readerships of active and opinionated sophisticated investors.
But, monitoring is simply employing one use of social media, “passive use”. By monitoring you’re essentially a spectator — watching without getting involved. That’s where the bulk of public companies currently reside.
As for “active participation” in social media there’s only a small minority of public companies to be found. These companies are using a variety of platforms to push press and financial news releases and, periodically, to interact. Examples can be found on Twitter (example) and Facebook (example).
While these examples demonstrate that there exists some level of “active participation” by IR in social media, those interactions are largely isolated to answering basic questions from retail investors. But when it comes to interacting with the substantial numbers of finance professionals and sophisticated investors who use social media sites and blogs to research stocks there’s little evidence that any substantive or high level discussions are currently taking place.
Explanation for lack of active participation
The most widely held explanation for the lack of “active participation” in social media is that public companies are concerned about violating Reg FD (fair disclosure). But while Reg FD may be a consideration, it’s hardly the only explanation.
If public companies were really enamored with the current scope of social media opportunities and wanted to protect themselves from potential Reg FD violations they would simply apply the same policies they do to every other public appearance by management. Similar risks are present when holding earnings calls (especially now that transcripts are freely available all over the Internet), making investor conference presentations, and conducting one-on-one investor meetings. In fact, if companies were actually able to identify appealing social platforms on which to interact they could simply apply the same policies they already have in place for other public communications.
Why isn’t IR “actively participating” and engaging sophisticated investors using social media? Because there’s no single social platform that offers both the “right” community and the “right” tools IR needs to meet their daily needs. Not Twitter. Not Facebook. Not any of the investor platforms, either. (That’s why companies are increasingly turning inward and beefing up their own IR websites with increasing amounts of useful investor content.)
For at their core, Twitter and Facebook are news and social networks, not dedicated investor communities. And since most public companies (especially small-caps) devote limited resources to IR activities, they must be incredibly efficient. They don’t have the time to correct every article or respond to every rumor posted on every social network on the Internet. That strategy is simply unsustainable.
Instead, if public companies were able to identify a dedicated investor platform (or two) that offered the tools they needed to expand the reach of their message, they would have the perfect complement to their existing IR efforts. Most importantly, they would have a social extension to their corporate IR sites which would help increase their chances of reaching new investors — an especially critical and challenging task at this point in time when sell-side research is on the decline and more public companies are competing to be noticed.
Conclusion
There will come a time when high-level, real-time conversations between public companies and sophisticated investors are commonplace online. We’ve already witnessed a glimpse of the remarkable possibilities. Of course, the real question now is where those conversations will take place.
Google’s recent announcement (and Expedia’s similar announcement) suggests that large cap companies are looking to increase their IR news distribution and social presence on their own corporate IR websites rather than letting those activities take place elsewhere. And, for large caps like Google, there’s no reason to think they won’t succeed.
But, many companies, especially small-caps, are not as fortunate as Google. They don’t enjoy a consistent stream of online traffic to their corporate websites. For them, a social investor platform as an extension of their own corporate IR sites is critical to reaching new investors.
So, don’t fault public companies for taking their time getting acquainted with social media. The fact is that the right combination of investor platform and tools that would allow companies to take full advantage of the opportunities social media has to offer doesn’t currently exist. But when the two ultimately materialize in tandem IR outreach will be transformed, substantive, high-level online discussion will then take place, and those IR firms I regularly communicate with will finally have the social media platform they crave.
Ezra was formerly with SeekingAlpha where he focused on product development. Prior to that he was an investment banker. He’s now an investor and advisor in the finance 2.0 space. Visit his blog: http://ezramarbach.blogspot.com/ and follow him on Twitter @ezramarbach
Subscribe to feed