• http://alephblog.com David Merkel

    Did a scan on EDGAR, INVO is the only mention of wikinvest, aside from VanceInfo, but that just mentions a a venture capitalist that helped create wikinvest that is on their board.

    • http://www.irwebreport.com Dominic Jones

      That’s correct, David. INVO is the only company that has disclosed a relationship. However, the relationships between CollegeStock and companies is often through a third-party, which is interesting in itself.

  • http://www.RxInvestors.com Justin M. Hall

    Thank you Dominic.

    I have alerted the members of my site about this potential conflict.

    Interestingly, the “Dean” has not posted a comment here yet.

  • http://www.newrulesofinvesting.com Zack Miller

    Great find, Dominic and interesting point. I’m going to take a contrarian view on this, though, that diverges from yours. Crowdsourcing, which is what a wiki essentially does, takes its cue from the aggregate public, including all types of biased and unbiased opinions. The idea is, even as it pertains to investing, is that the checks and balances of an open-system should provide for better information for the reader. Your point — that this should at least require disclosure — is addressed through the public nature of wikis. All individual viewpoints are smoothed out and aggregated as multiple editing takes over. Wikinvest’s answer — for you to edit the articles written by “The Dean” — speaks to this. You almost want biased views to make all this happen.
    The problem where wikis fail for stocks is in small caps, where there is truly very little attention paid or information available about the companies. Attention and info about small caps is illiquid just like most of the stocks. I don’t see “The Dean”‘s postings as anything more than reposting 10k type information — clearly, more egregious behavior should require a response from Wikinvest (something they said they would, and do, do).
    I don’t mean to sound like a Wikinvest pump monkey, but that’s my feeling about collaborative stock research.

    • http://www.irwebreport.com Dominic Jones

      Zack,

      You’re describing an ideal that doesn’t exist here because of the lack of contributors to wikinvest, and site managers who don’t think clear and prominent disclosure of conflicts is important. They’re unwilling to fix even the lack of disclosure.

      I wouldn’t mind one bit if it was obvious that The Dean had a bias. But in this case I spent hours digging around until I found the disclosures buried halfway into a disclaimer on an entirely separate site. Even then, the disclosures were out-of-date and contradictory.

      While I agree the posted content seems harmless, that’s not the point. The fact that it’s posted by someone with a vested interest in making it seem better than it might be is a relevant fact I should have easy access to.

  • http://www.howardlindzon.com howardlindzon

    it is why we just do not even recognize bulletin board stocks and microcap nasdaq on stocktwits..it's just too wild west on all sides.

  • Pingback: Web 2.0 Anlegerplattformen in den USA | Online Investor Relations