• About
    • Site Profile
    • Pam Agnew, ABC (editor)
    • Dominic Jones (editor)
  • Contacts
IR Web Report
  • Latest Posts
  • Categories
    • Web Disclosure
    • Annual Reports
    • Quarterly Reporting
    • Presentations
    • Social Media
    • IR Law
    • Governance
    • Shareholder Services
    • Video
    • Mobile
  • Book Store
  • Jobs
Browse: Home / US firms love e-proxy savings, but at what cost?


US firms love e-proxy savings, but at what cost?

By Dominic Jones on June 9, 2008

  • Tweet

DESPITE the risk that they might be reaping short-term gains while laying the foundation for long-term pain, 566 US companies used notice-only e-proxy mailings for their shareholder meetings by the end of April.

According to figures compiled by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc., companies have saved about $132 million through lower print and mailing costs.

Unfortunately, that has come at the expense of retail investor engagement in the corporate governance of firms. Based on 164 completed meetings, Broadridge reports a 75% drop in participation among retail shareholders who received only a notice asking them to go online to view their materials or order print materials to be mailed to them.

Retail participation dropped from 21.17% to 5.35%

Interestingly, participation jumps dramatically when retail shareholders receive a full set of printed meeting materials in the mail. More than 66% of retail investors who received full-set delivery voted in companies’ meetings. Broadridge reports that companies are increasingly stratifying their distributions, often sending their smallest shareholders notices only while larger holders receive a full set of materials.

Meanwhile, the lack of participation by retail shareholders is unlikely to worry companies in the short-term. The average quorum at shareholder meetings is still high, 88% compared to 90% last year.

However, the figures include the much-criticized broker vote, which are uninstructed votes cast by brokerage firms on behalf of their clients on “routine” matters, including director elections. Since 2006, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been sitting on a proposal from the New York Stock Exchange to eliminate the broker vote in director elections.

If the SEC agrees to scrap the broker vote, it could impact the ability of some firms to achieve a quorum and put the re-election of directors at many more companies in doubt, especially if they have adopted majority voting standards for board elections.

Meeting quorums have remained largely unchanged thanks to uninstructed broker discetionary voting and heavy institutional shareowernship

But even if the SEC does nothing, the lack of engagement by retail investors in the shareholder meeting process is likely to lead to disaffection in the longer term. That could put companies at even greater risk if they are targeted by activist institutional investors since the lack of retail participation magnifies the activists’ impact.

There is an additional concern for consumer-related businesses, which often can count on retail shareholders to be some of the best ambassadors and champions for their products. However, if these shareholders are not being engaged to keep informed about the companies whose shares they own, businesses could lose this valuable constituency.

Chasing short-term glory at expense of corporate reputation

In an age when technology enables virtually anyone to share their opinions with others almost instantly, companies cannot afford to alienate people who have such a strong vested interest in their success as do shareholders.

However, this appears to be exactly what many companies are doing. Individual corporate secretaries and IROs are chasing the glory of short-term savings without due consideration of the long-term impacts in terms of corporate reputation, word-of-mouth marketing, community support, and stakeholder engagement.

Few companies that have used voluntary e-proxy to date have made an effort to provide the online versions of their proxy statements and annual reports in usable and engaging formats. As we reported last week, almost 90% of companies chose formats that do not live up to the spirit of the SEC’s rules.

Electronic delivery has many benefits, but companies must be concerned about a lack of main street participation and take steps to increase retail engagement going forward. This is best done by investing in their web-based communications to create more engaging destinations for shareholders — not just annually around their shareholder meetings, but throughout the year.


Dominic Jones

Dominic Jones (bio) created IR Web Report in 2001. He is a consultant to leading public companies and investor relations service providers worldwide. You can contact him via the contacts page.

Posted in Annual Reports, Articles, Corporate Governance | Tagged annual meeting, annual meetings, broadridge financial solutions inc, director elections, e-proxy, new york stock exchange, proxy statement, proxy statements, retail investor, retail investors, retail shareholders, SEC, securities and exchange commission, shareholder meetings, technology

« Previous Next »

Search the Site

Latest Stories

  • SEC’s Social Media Guidance Has Devil in Details
  • Crisis investor relations in the age of social media
  • Private meetings undermine fair disclosure, study finds
  • What makes a good annual report?
  • CEO pushes Reg FD limits on Twitter
  • For IROs, XBRL errors a wake-up call
  • Despite Reg FD, study finds traders profit from private CEO meetings

Get Our Free Email Newsletter

Close
Note: We don't sell or rent our email list. Unsubscribe instructions come with each email.
Investor relations jobs by IR Web Report

Full Disclosure

All articles on IR Web Report are unpaid editorial. We do not charge a fee to outside contributors. Sponsors or advertisers are not automatically entitled to become contributors or receive editorial coverage. We accept contributors based on their individual expertise and experience. Contributors are required to disclose when they write about or refer to any company with which they have a business relationship, either directly or indirectly. If you believe that any contributor or IR Web Report is not living up this policy, please contact us or leave a comment on the relevant post. Editorial integrity is important to us and we take all complaints seriously.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Terms of Use
  • IR Web Report’s Book Store
  • IR News
  • About
  • Contacts

Archives

  • 2013
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us

Follow @irwebreport
Feed Subscribe to feed

Copyright © 2001 - 2013 IR Web Reporting International Inc. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.