• About
  • Contacts
IR Web Report
  • Latest Posts
  • Categories
    • Web Disclosure
    • Annual Reports
    • Quarterly Reporting
    • Presentations
    • Social Media
    • IR Law
    • Governance
    • Shareholder Services
    • Video
    • Mobile
Browse: Home / Reflections on 2008 annual report season


Reflections on 2008 annual report season

By Dominic Jones on June 3, 2008

  • Tweet

THE online annual reporting period in Europe and North America is drawing to a close — and except for an elite group of forward-thinking companies it has been a disappointing season.

This was the first year where many companies had the option of delivering their reports on the web as the default option. This was also the first year that all large US companies were required to post their annual reports and proxy statements online in formats “convenient” for both onscreen reading and for printing.

Consequently, we expected that many more companies would make long-overdue investments to improve the usability and interactivity of their reports. But that did not happen. Not by a long shot.

Despite the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) explicitly requiring usable documents, our reviews have found that almost 90% of companies chose formats that do not live up to the spirit of the rules.

Ironically, in the United Kingdom where the Companies Act is silent on the usability of online annual reports, more big companies provided full HTML reports this year compared to last year — 46% versus 32%, according to a survey by design firm Radley Yeldar.

Image-based documents back with a vengeance in US

There appears to be widespread ignorance about what constitutes an effective format for online annual reports and proxy statements. Most US firms that took advantage of default electronic delivery posted their online reports in large, poorly-formatted PDFs and hard-to-use image-based formats purchased from big vendors who obviously know little about effective online communications.

Warner Goup image-based annual report 2007
Image-based annual reports like this one from Broadridge’s supplier EZ Online Documents have poor usability and should not be permitted by regulators.

That image-based documents should be so dominant this year is surprising given that the usability problems with these formats have been well-documented since 2003 when IR Web Report and Jakob Nielsen, the world’s leading web usability expert, first started explaining why companies should avoid using these document formats for their annual reports.

The problems with image-based documents include:

  • Hard-to-use navigation;
  • Fuzzy text;
  • Inability for analysts, investors and journalists to reuse content: and,
  • Inconsistent usability conventions across vendors.

In many ways, image-based reports are less usable even that bulky PDF files. Companies are being grossly overcharged for these unusable online documents because they are unaware that the conversion process is largely automated. The fact is, similar or better conversions are available free of charge in as little as 5 minutes to anyone who knows how to open a file on a computer and copy and paste a snippet of code into a webpage.

Vendor-fueled confusion around SEC’s requirements

The main culprit for the resurgence of image-based documents is confusion about the SEC’s requirements for online formats and websites hosting proxy materials. The SEC’s ambiguous language in the e-proxy adopting release about the use of cookies has created an opportunity for vendors to scare companies into buying image-based documents from them.

Ciena's 2007 online annual report
This is an example of an image-based annual report from Computershare. It is perhaps the least usable of the lot.

In some cases, companies that provide usable HTML reports on their own websites have paid to have duplicate, less usable image-based documents created on a vendor’s website because they have been told by vendors that they must provide their materials on a “cookie-free” website, even though that term is not used anywhere in the SEC’s rules. Ironically, the websites on which the duplicate reports are hosted are using cookies themselves.

The SEC needs to clarify its rules around cookies and what constitutes a convenient format because the current language has resulted in proxy materials being less usable than before the rules came into effect. The confusion around cookies and formats also has resulted in few companies having access to good web analytics on which to base future improvements to their reports.

Corporate reporting leaders continue to innovate

But it’s not all bad news. This year we saw some important innovations for online annual reports among an elite group of companies.

European companies comprise the bulk of this forward-thinking class. The elite North American companies can be counted on one hand, and are mostly companies that have long histories of best practice online communications.

Among the leaders, several new and interesting trends have emerged. Online annual reports are becoming more interactive and more customizable.

The quality of the design and coding is also improving, with some reports meeting all of the standards of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the standard-setting body for the web.

Although they can be a significant expense, we continue to recommend high-end online annual reports and proxy statements as highly effective communications, disclosure and relationship-building tools. They engage, inform and educate investors, make it easier for people to quickly look up key facts throughout the year, and they demonstrate management’s accountability to shareholders and commitment to open and effective communications.

Our current issue of Online IR Trends has an 18-page feature detailing the online annual report innovations we’ve seen this year.

For the vendor reps in the audience, we will be running our Great Online Annual Report Designers list again in the next few weeks. We’ve been getting inquiries from developers we didn’t hear from last year and have been impressed with their work.

That’s a good sign for IROs and corporate secretaries as it means they’ll have more vendors to choose from for what is already shaping up to be an interesting 2009 annual reporting season.


Dominic Jones

Dominic Jones (bio) created IR Web Report in 2001. He is a consultant to leading public companies and investor relations service providers worldwide. You can contact him via the contacts page.

Posted in Annual Reports, Articles, Disclosure | Tagged corporate reporting, e-proxy, electronic delivery, online annual reports, proxy statements, securities and exchange commission, usability

« Previous Next »

Search the Site

Latest Stories

  • Survey finds social media gap between investors, companies
  • SEC’s social media guidance has devil in details
  • Crisis investor relations in the age of social media
  • Private meetings undermine fair disclosure, study finds
  • What makes a good annual report?
  • CEO pushes Reg FD limits on Twitter
  • For IROs, XBRL errors a wake-up call

Get Our Free Email Newsletter

Close
Note: We don't sell or rent our email list. Unsubscribe instructions come with each email.

Full Disclosure

All articles on IR Web Report are unpaid editorial. We do not charge a fee to outside contributors. Sponsors or advertisers are not automatically entitled to become contributors or receive editorial coverage. We accept contributors based on their individual expertise and experience. Contributors are required to disclose when they write about or refer to any company with which they have a business relationship, either directly or indirectly. If you believe that any contributor or IR Web Report is not living up this policy, please contact us or leave a comment on the relevant post. Editorial integrity is important to us and we take all complaints seriously.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Terms of Use
  • IR News
  • About
  • Contacts

Archives

  • 2013
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us

Follow @irwebreport
Feed Subscribe to feed

Copyright © 2001 - 2018 IR Web Reporting International Inc. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and our Privacy & Cookie Use Policy.