• Find Service Providers
  • IR Jobs
  • About Us
    • Editor’s Blog
    • Dominic Jones
    • Pam Agnew, ABC
  • Contacts
  • Advertise
IR Web Report
  • Latest Posts
  • Online IR
    • Web Disclosure
      • Disclosure leaks
    • Annual Reports
    • Quarterly Reporting
    • Presentations
    • Shareholder Services
    • Video
    • Mobile
  • Social Media
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Content Sharing
    • StockTwits
  • IR Law
  • Governance
  • Rankings
    • About the Rankings
    • Articles
Browse: Home / Company tries e-proxy, misses quorum

Company tries e-proxy, misses quorum

By Dominic Jones on January 18, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email

PROFESSIONAL Veterinary Products Limited (PVPL), a customer-owned wholesaler of supplies to veterinary clinics, has been forced to reschedule its annual meeting after its notice-only eproxy solicitation failed to achieve a quorum.

The company’s annual meeting, originally set for January 11, has been adjourned to February 1 to give the company time to drum up proxies. Last year when the company was not able to use the new default electronic delivery process, about 57% of the company’s shareholders returned their proxy forms.

The company did not say in its filing with the SEC yesterday how many had done so for this year’s failed meeting.

PVPL has 2,068 shareholders, all of whom are veterinarians or veterinary clinics. The company says its “shareholders also are our primary customers.” The shares have a fixed value of $3,000 each and can only be sold back to the company.

A lesson worth noting

While PVPL’s ownership structure is atypical of most companies that are trying notice-only proxy solicitations to save money, its experience nonetheless highlights an important point.

Most companies would likely fail to achieve quorums if not for the fact that the majority of their stock is held by institutional investors who are obligated to cast their ballots.

As we highlight in our guidelines for shareholder meetings on the Web, a better measure of a successful notice-only proxy campaign is not the quorum figure, but the level of retail shareholder participation. Retail participation rates measure how many people participate because they want to, not because they have to.

Corporate secretaries and IROs who talk about the “success” of their notice-only campaigns, even while they experienced massive declines in retail participation, really have nothing to be proud of.

Finally, the fact that so many of PVPL’s customer-shareholders were not motivated to go online to access their proxies may suggest deeper problems in PVPL’s business itself.


Dominic Jones

Dominic (bio & disclosures) is IR Web Report‘s founder and an online investor relations consultant. He advises leading public companies and investor relations service providers worldwide on using the web for disclosure, engagement and profile building. You can contact him via the contacts page.

Posted in Articles | Tagged e-proxy, EDGAR, SEC | Leave a response

« Previous Next »

Free Email Updates

Close

Feed Subscribe to real-time push feed
Follow @irwebreport
 
List your firm now

Check out these IR service providers

  • InsuranceIR LLC
  • Virtua Research
  • SNL IR Solutions
  • ViaVid Communications Inc.

Latest Stories

  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • Crisis investor relations in the age of social media
  • This week in Investor Relations
  • Private meetings undermine fair disclosure, study finds
  • This week in Investor Relations

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us

IR Web Report on LinkedIn

Full Disclosure

All articles on IR Web Report are unpaid editorial. We do not charge a fee to outside contributors. Sponsors or advertisers are not automatically entitled to become contributors or receive editorial coverage. We accept contributors based on their individual expertise and experience. Contributors are required to disclose when they write about or refer to any company with which they have a business relationship, either directly or indirectly. If you believe that any contributor or IR Web Report is not living up this policy, please contact us or leave a comment on the relevant post. Editorial integrity is important to us and we take all complaints seriously.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Services
    • Seminars
    • Social Media
    • Consulting
    • Web Audits
  • Investis Online IR Rankings
  • About the Rankings
  • IR News
  • Guides
    • The New Online Disclosure
    • Online Investor Presentations
  • About
  • Contacts

Archives

  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us

IR Web Report on LinkedIn
Follow @irwebreport

Copyright © 2001 - 2012 IR Web Reporting International Inc. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.