• Pam

    The way I read the NIRI numbers, you have just alienated 56% of the people reading this story. People stopped reading annual reports long before 10-K wraps came along. Printing glossy reports was a waste of effort and money. The 10-K wrap is a way to cut unnecessary costs.

  • Rob

    I agree with Pam – annual reports have limited shelf life and are often an unnecessary expense that many companies can do without

    Financial info. on the Internet is readily available, not only from corporate websites but many other sources as well

    If a company wants a marketing piece, they should create it – a glossy annual report is a dinosaur

    -Rob

  • http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/ Dominic Jones

    Pam, Rob:

    Perhaps full glossy reports are a waste of money, but there are other ways to cut production costs without adversely affecting the utility and communication effectiveness of the document. Use cheaper paper stock, avoid gratuitous photos, write tighter, plainer content. In fact, you can make a 10-K quite usable on the web if you try. I’ve seen it done very effectively at very low cost.

    These things do take more effort and bit more forethought. And that’s the point. There’s no effort and no forethought. Reporting to shareholders, the owners, is not a consideration in 10-K wraps.

  • Rob

    Yes, points well taken, Dominic

    10-Ks are far from user/shareholder-friendly, and are geared to more sophisticated investors who often pore over the fine print – understandably so

    I think companies should focus their efforts more on writing coherent, forthright news announcements and keeping investors updated via their websites and quarterly (if not more often) conference calls and webcasts (that are open to all investors

    Annuals are fine, but once again the shelf-life becomes an issue and you are telling investors what happened over a TTM period that is already outdated by the time it goes to press, in many cases

    -Rob