• rebecca

    Funny how in the tom-glocer-this-may-scare-you-blog uncle Tom puts shareholders before clients. Funny that!

  • Pingback: Investor Relations Blog » Is Thomson’s IR/PR business for sale?

  • http://blog.irmanager.org Peter Schiefelbein

    I agree with you about the fundamental conflicts resulting from the purchase. Could there also be a hint of desperation in Thomson’s move.

    Thomson’s professional publications business is under stress. On the revenue side both advertising rates and advertising customer numbers are under pressure because of the new alternatives being presented by the internet. Professional journals have printing costs and not all the content is valued by all readers so content costs are higher than more focused web based alternatives where advertisers just pay for the eyes they want. Also, if writers can go direct to their readers through their own specialized sites they dis-intermediate the traditional publishers like Thomson. Professional journals will still have their place but the business model is no longer as robust as it used to be. If in response the professional publishers choose to go on line they weaken what used to be their major barrier to entry; the exorbitant costs associated with start-up magazines because of printed but unread product and the costs of building an advertising base. New web based professional sites should be able to get advertisers quickly if they have an audience. The mainstream publishers may not be able to reap the same revenues on-line that they used to achieve off-line.

    Thomson’s data services are low value added. They gather and package information which is readily available to any competitor prepared to go to the same trouble. New competitors will emerge because the cost of gathering and packaging information is falling dramatically. There are now more ways to access analyst research, consensus earnings numbers, share price information etc and much of this product is now free or at least cheap compared to Thomson. The direction things are taking is probably keeping the Thomson exec team awake at night.

    Thomson has to move up the value chain. They need to find new high value added content that can be packaged with the data and professional services businesses they already offer. Ideally this content should offer better protection than the data collection based products they now have. The acquisition of Reuters could provide this. Duplicating the Reuters infrastructure and building an equivalent brand would be very expensive for Thomson or anyone else.

    It just shows how the internet is a blessing for most of us but maybe a curse for a few, Thomson included.

    Peter Schiefelbein

    Author of Investor Relations Aware Blog

  • Pingback: Thomson Financial upgrades IR website platform - IRWebReport.com