• About
    • Site Profile
    • Pam Agnew, ABC (editor)
    • Dominic Jones (editor)
  • Contacts
IR Web Report
  • Latest Posts
  • Categories
    • Web Disclosure
    • Annual Reports
    • Quarterly Reporting
    • Presentations
    • Social Media
    • IR Law
    • Governance
    • Shareholder Services
    • Video
    • Mobile
  • Book Store
  • Jobs
Browse: Home / Obscuring disclosure with bad format choices


Obscuring disclosure with bad format choices

By Dominic Jones on April 12, 2006

  • Tweet

OK, here’s what we know: Investors mostly access corporate reporting information online and they are mostly interested in financial statements.

So why would a company post its financial statements on the Web in a format that makes it next to impossible to read or use online?

Clearly they shouldn’t, yet that’s exactly what I was presented with during a recent site review of the IR website of Suez SA, a large gas and electric utility based in France.

The company has taken its financial statements, pasted them into PowerPoint… then copied images of the slides into a word processor document … then created a PDF document.

The result is that it is impossible for me to read the financials at 100% magnification in my PDF reader.

This is shown in the screenshot of the cash flow statement, which is taken at a resolution of 1024 x 768, the most common resolution on people’s computers globally according to a July 2005 report by OneStat. In other words, the image is exactly the size and resolution as I saw it, or didn’t see it, on my screen.

screenshot of PDF view

It’s obvious that the above view is illegible. However, zooming in does not help. Since the cash flow statement is embedded in an image in the PDF, magnifying the view simply distorts the image. This is shown below in the image of the PDF document at 150% magnification.

Although I am able to read most of the figures, it is a strain and I have to look carefully. Some figures are illegible, particularly for the most recent and most relevant period, which is reversed out of green. For example, is the “Cash flow from operating activities” line for 06/30/05 2,024 million or 2,924 million?

Now let’s say I want to enter these figures into a spreadsheet. I can’t except by manually re-keying all the information. I am prevented from copying and pasting the figures because they are embedded in an image within the PDF file.

All of this simply makes the information unusable on the Web. It has the same utility as paper, no more.

Why a company would do this is a matter of conjecture, but it is probably out of ignorance of the needs of investors. It’s either that or the company doesn’t want you to read its figures, much less subject them to scrutiny in a spreadsheet.

In an age when people like the SEC’s chairman Christopher Cox are trying to coax companies to interactive financials using XBRL, it is astonishing that practices like this persist.

More astonishing still is that many, many companies do similar things every day.


Dominic Jones

Dominic Jones (bio) created IR Web Report in 2001. He is a consultant to leading public companies and investor relations service providers worldwide. You can contact him via the contacts page.

Posted in Annual Reports, Disclosure, Online IR | Tagged annual reporting, corporate reporting, PDF, Quarterly Reporting, usability, web usability

« Previous Next »

Search the Site

Latest Stories

  • Survey finds social media gap between investors, companies
  • SEC’s social media guidance has devil in details
  • Crisis investor relations in the age of social media
  • Private meetings undermine fair disclosure, study finds
  • What makes a good annual report?
  • CEO pushes Reg FD limits on Twitter
  • For IROs, XBRL errors a wake-up call

Get Our Free Email Newsletter

Close
Note: We don't sell or rent our email list. Unsubscribe instructions come with each email.
Investor relations jobs by IR Web Report

Full Disclosure

All articles on IR Web Report are unpaid editorial. We do not charge a fee to outside contributors. Sponsors or advertisers are not automatically entitled to become contributors or receive editorial coverage. We accept contributors based on their individual expertise and experience. Contributors are required to disclose when they write about or refer to any company with which they have a business relationship, either directly or indirectly. If you believe that any contributor or IR Web Report is not living up this policy, please contact us or leave a comment on the relevant post. Editorial integrity is important to us and we take all complaints seriously.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Terms of Use
  • IR Web Report’s Book Store
  • IR News
  • About
  • Contacts

Archives

  • 2013
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us

Follow @irwebreport
Feed Subscribe to feed

Copyright © 2001 - 2013 IR Web Reporting International Inc. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.