• About
  • Contacts
IR Web Report
  • Latest Posts
  • Categories
    • Web Disclosure
    • Annual Reports
    • Quarterly Reporting
    • Presentations
    • Social Media
    • IR Law
    • Governance
    • Shareholder Services
    • Video
    • Mobile
  • Book Store
  • Jobs
Browse: Home / Icing analysts not unique to Enron


Icing analysts not unique to Enron

By Dominic Jones on February 10, 2006

  • Tweet

IN ENRON trial testimony last week, the company’s disgraced former IRO Mark Koenig told of how his bosses, former chairman Ken Lay and former CEO Jeff Skilling, sought to keep a tough analyst away from earnings calls and investor meetings because he was critical of the company.

According to the Enron TrialWatch blog, the two accused asked him about no longer inviting Merrill Lynch analyst John Olson to analyst meetings where Enron would detail its quarterly or annual earnings.

“He was one of the few who went out on a limb in probing and had a negative opinion about the company,” the blog reports Koenig as saying, adding that Olson later blamed Lay for pressuring his bosses into firing him from Merrill Lynch.

Ironically, on the same day as this testimony is heard, IR Magazine runs an article “Guide to Icing Analysts” which suggests that such tactics are commonplace today. A few choice extracts:

The IR magazine-commissioned Investor Perception Study, US 2005 reveals that some 38 percent of American sell-side analysts say they have been shut out by a company after a downgrade. Europeans report an even higher rate of discrimination at 42 percent. One individual calls this ‘standard practice’ by all the companies he covers.

An August memo from Robert Colby, deputy director of the [SEC’s] division
of market regulation, discloses some of the more common ways companies punish analysts: not allowing them to ask questions on conference calls, limiting
access to senior management, not inviting them to participate in non-deal
roadshows, threatening to withdraw business from other areas of the analysts’
firm, ‘intimidation and humiliation’ on conference calls or in the media,
and threatening legal action.

Yet IROs openly talk about several methods of expressing their displeasure – or, as one puts it, ‘behavioral therapy for analysts’: reshuffling message slips, complaining to immediate superiors (or higher up), and indirect retaliation. This latter strategy is expressed by the adage, ‘It’s not what you do to an analyst – it’s what you do on behalf of his competition.’ As one investor relations professional with 30 years’ experience puts it, ‘You can ignore someone in many different ways.’


Dominic Jones

Dominic Jones (bio) created IR Web Report in 2001. He is a consultant to leading public companies and investor relations service providers worldwide. You can contact him via the contacts page.

Posted in Articles, Investor Relations | Tagged analysts

« Previous Next »

Search the Site

Latest Stories

  • Survey finds social media gap between investors, companies
  • SEC’s social media guidance has devil in details
  • Crisis investor relations in the age of social media
  • Private meetings undermine fair disclosure, study finds
  • What makes a good annual report?
  • CEO pushes Reg FD limits on Twitter
  • For IROs, XBRL errors a wake-up call

Get Our Free Email Newsletter

Close
Note: We don't sell or rent our email list. Unsubscribe instructions come with each email.

Full Disclosure

All articles on IR Web Report are unpaid editorial. We do not charge a fee to outside contributors. Sponsors or advertisers are not automatically entitled to become contributors or receive editorial coverage. We accept contributors based on their individual expertise and experience. Contributors are required to disclose when they write about or refer to any company with which they have a business relationship, either directly or indirectly. If you believe that any contributor or IR Web Report is not living up this policy, please contact us or leave a comment on the relevant post. Editorial integrity is important to us and we take all complaints seriously.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Terms of Use
  • IR Web Report’s Book Store
  • IR News
  • About
  • Contacts

Archives

  • 2013
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001

About IR Web Report

Founded in 2001, we are the world's leading source of information about online investor relations communications. Our core philosophy is that investors' needs must come first or companies' online communications efforts will fail to be effective. More about us

Follow @irwebreport
Feed Subscribe to feed

Copyright © 2001 - 2018 IR Web Reporting International Inc. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and our Privacy & Cookie Use Policy.